Author:
Aggarwal Rashmi,Ghosh Ayan
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of directors’ remuneration on the firm’s intrinsic and extrinsic value.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper provides a brief review of the literature on directors’ remuneration and identifies the current knowledge on the relationship between profit sharing or directors’ remuneration and the firm’s performance. In addition, correlation analysis between the directors’ compensation and various parameters measuring the firm’s performance is done.
Findings
– From an investor’s viewpoint, the performance indicators indicated no significant relation of the increase in the firm’s performance with the increase in directors’ remuneration. But, from the accounting viewpoint, there exists a positive correlation between the two. Therefore, the directors’ remuneration adds to the intrinsic value of the firm, but does not contribute significantly to the extrinsic value of the firm.
Research limitations/implications
– Future research could encompass a larger sample of companies. Also, a comparison could be done for the companies for periods before and after the modification of Clause 49 post-Satyam fiasco. The present study is done after a short period of the modification to the Clause 49.
Originality/value
– The study provides a unique examination of remuneration of the board of directors and the firm’s performance. It studies the impact of the directors’ remuneration and its impact on firm’s performance. The study encompasses an exhaustive analysis for the emerging market, namely, India. The research studies 40 companies, which are unique from each other and explores the relation. It explores four parameters studying both the intrinsic and extrinsic values of the firm.
Reference48 articles.
1. Abdullah, S.N.
(2006), “Directors’ remuneration, firm’s performance and corporate governance in Malaysia among distressed companies”,
Corporate Governance
, Vol. 6 No. 2.
2. Parthasarathy, A.
,
Menon, K.
and
Bhattacharjee, D.
(2006), “Firm performance and governance: an empirical study”,
Economic Policy Review
, Vol. 41 No. 39.
3. Bognanno, M.L.
(2001), “Corporate tournaments”,
Journal of Labor Economics
, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 290-315.
4. Bryan, S.
,
Hwang, L.
and
Lilien, S.
(2000), “CEO stock-based compensation: an empirical analysis of incentive-intensity, relative mix, and economic determinants”,
Jounal of Business
, Vol. 73 No. 4, pp. 661-693.
5. Cadbury, S.A.
(1992),
Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance
, The Committee and Gee Publishing, London.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献