Sustainability of community engagement – in the hands of stakeholders?

Author:

Ramachandra Anubama,Naha Abu Mansor Nur

Abstract

Purpose – The current gap in the field of community engagement is evaluation and measurement of the impacts on the stakeholders, mainly the community being engaged with. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This paper discusses the need to consider the stakeholder's perspective and their involvement in a community engagement initiative, or in any social program. The authors begin by debating the most common evaluation techniques used, followed by re-introducing stakeholder evaluation to the field of community engagement. Findings – The evaluation using the stakeholders’ approach will not only create a holistic evaluation process, but will also assist in fostering a sense of ownership of the community engagement program. Originality/value – Community engagement is given much importance nowadays in Malaysia, especially in line with institutes of higher learning's tripartite mission, the third mission being the ability to engage with communities. It is not surprising because community engagement offers enormous benefits for regional and societal development. Community engagement relies heavily on partnership and mutual reciprocity between different stakeholders such as communities, universities, non-government organizations, field experts and funding organizations. In order to sustain the engagement initiatives, it is important to know who are the “owners” or stakeholders of the program.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies

Reference43 articles.

1. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. (2011), “Strategic management of stakeholders: theory and practice”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 179-196.

2. Ash, S.L. , Clayton, P.H. and Atkinson, M.P. (2005), “Integrating reflection and assessment to capture and improve student learning”, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Vol. 1, Spring, pp. 49-60.

3. Bender, G. (2008), “Exploring conceptual models for community engagement at higher education institutions in South Africa”, Perspectives in Education, Vol. 26 No 1, pp. 81-95.

4. Bridger, J.C. and Alter, T.R. (2006), “The engaged university, community development, and public scholarship”, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 163-178.

5. Clayton, P.H. , Bringle, R.G. and Morrison, M. (2010), “Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: exploitative , transactional , or transformational”, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Vol. 1, Spring, pp. 5-22.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3