Abstract
PurposeDiscrimination in the marketplace has recently received increasing attention in marketing discussions, especially related to service encounters. This research explores the effect of receiving lower (vs higher) financial compensation than someone perceived to be from an upper social class (vs lower) on consumer reactions after a service recovery situation.Design/methodology/approachTwo experimental studies with two different populations.FindingsIndividuals who receive less compensation than someone from a higher socioeconomic status tend to attribute differential treatment to discrimination. Both individuals who received less and who received higher compensation are willing to engage in negative word of mouth, however, only consumers who were discriminated against want to take revenge on the company.Originality/valuePrevious literature indicates that consumers' reactions after service problems are mediated by justice perceptions. This research offers a new perspective of social comparison in service recovery situations by considering the role of discrimination perceptions.
Reference50 articles.
1. Too good to be true? Boundary conditions to the use of downward social comparisons in service recovery;JSR,2018
2. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the JCR;JCR,2021
3. White response to potentially discriminatory actions in a services setting;Psychology and Marketing,2011
4. Moderating effect of discriminatory attributions on repatronage intentions;JRCS,2012
5. Individual differences in perceptions of service failure and recovery;JAMS,2008
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献