Inter-organizational business process verification in public administration
Author:
Corradini Flavio,Polini Andrea,Re Barbara
Abstract
Purpose
– Public services can be modelled, analysed and implemented using notations and tools for the business process (BP) abstraction. Applying such an explicit approach public administrations (PAs) can better react to the undergoing transformation in service provisioning and they can continuously improve service quality in order to satisfy citizens and business requests, while coping with decreasing budgets. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– The proposed approach relies on using formal methods, in particular unfolding to analyse the correctness of BP. The paper also compares and selects mapping rules from semi-formal to formal modelling languages; these techniques are presented in the context of the BP Modelling Languages and Petri Net (PN).
Findings
– Main aim of this paper is to raise the need for formal verification of BP governing the interactions among PAs, which more and more need to be supported by ICT mechanisms, and then are not so much tolerant to errors and imperfections in the process specification. The paper illustrates the main motivations of such a work and it introduces a verification technique of a BP using a mapping of a high-level notation (such as BPMN 2.0) to a formal notation (such as PNs) for which formal analysis techniques can be adopted. In particular the verification step is implemented using an unfolding-based technique.
Originality/value
– The paper answers a call for further development of the body of knowledge on effective analysis of BPs, a rapidly emerging field of interest for large and ultra large scenarios, where a clear gap in literature exists. Than the paper shows that formal techniques are mature enough to be applied on real scenarios.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference54 articles.
1. Aguilar-Saven, R.S.
(2004), “Business process modelling: review and framework”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 90 No. 2, pp. 129-149. 2. Awad, A.
,
Decker, G.
and
Lohmann, N.
(2010), “Diagnosing and repairing data anomalies in process models”, in
Rinderle-Ma, S.
,
Sadiq, S.
and
Leymann, F.
(Eds),
Business Process Management Workshops, Volume 43 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 5-16. 3. Borger, E.
and
Thalheim, B.
(2008a), “A method for verifiable and validatable business process modeling”, in
Borger, E.
and
Cisternino, A.
(Eds),
Advances in Software Engineering
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 59-115. 4. Borger, E.
and
Thalheim, B.
(2008b), “Modeling workflows, interaction patterns, web services and business processes: the ASM-based approach”, in
Borger, E.
,
Butler, M.
,
Bowen, J.
and
Boca, P.
(Eds),
Abstract State Machines, B and Z, Volume 5238 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 24-38. 5. Breu, R.
,
Dustdar, S.
,
Eder, J.
,
Huemer, C.
,
Kappel, G.
,
Kopke, J.
,
Langer, P.
,
Mangler, J.
,
Mendling, J.
,
Neumann, G.
,
Rinderle-Ma, S.
,
Schulte, S.
,
Sobernig, S.
and
Weber, B.
(2013), “Towards living inter-organizational processes”, IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), IEEE, pp. 363-366.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|