Author:
Bazillier Rémi,Vauday Julien
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to provide a theoretical approach of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in order to assess whether CSR will develop as a concept pushing efficiently for more de facto social responsibility or will become a pure marketing artefact. The trade-off between the development of CSR behaviour and lobbying over regulations is a key element that will influence the evolution of CSR. The result is that if the world consolidates or if it tends towards multilateralism to a large extent, then CSR is less likely to have an efficient impact.
Design/methodology/approach
– Theoretical approach based on three fields: credence goods, greenwashing and political economy.
Findings
– The coordination is harder for lobbies in the more multilateral scenario. The more politically powerful group would lose its influence on the decision body in the multipolar scenario. If lobbies keep influencing their state governments, the efficiency would also be reduced in the regionalization or multipolar scenarios. The easiness of the greenwashing strategy is also crucial in order to determine the possible evolution of the CSR as a real commitment that benefits environment and society.
Research limitations/implications
– Countries may take advantage of CSR by offering an advantage to firms willing to develop CSR thanks to public regulations if greenwashing is easy and if the evolution of the world that prevails is similar to the tripolar or regionalization scenarios. This may also occur under the multipolar scenario but it would necessitate an effective international coordination.
Originality/value
– This is the first work that brings together the strategic behaviour of firms with respect to Corporate Social Responsibility and political economy determinants. The predicted evolutions of these two features according to the degree of multilateralism as well as how they are intertwined are also novelties of this paper.
Subject
Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference17 articles.
1. Abélès, M.
(2008), Anthropologie de la globalisation, Payot, Paris.
2. Antras, P.
,
Padro, I.
and
Miquel, G.
(2011), “Foreign influence and welfare”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 135-148.
3. Bartel, A.
and
Thomas, L.G.
(1985), “Direct and indirect effects of regulation: a new look at OSHA's impact”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1-25.
4. Bazillier, R.
and
Vauday, J.
(2009), “The greenwashing machine: is CSR more than communication?”, Working Paper du LEO, 2009-2010.
5. Bourdon, W.
(2010), Face aux crimes du marché, Editions La Découverte, Paris.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献