Open innovation practices adopted by private stakeholders: perspectives for living labs

Author:

Lapointe Dominic,Guimont David

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to explore the role of private stakeholders in the living lab (LL) ecosystem and the relationship of private stakeholders to open innovation (OI) practices. There is extensive literature on private stakeholders and OI, but seldom mention is made on the specific question of how private stakeholders integrate OI in the context of a LL. Design/methodology/approach – The authors will analyze qualitatively how private businesses that have participated in a in situ open innovation evaluate and perceived their open innovation practices. Therefore, how they relate to open innovation. Then, the authors will identify a typology of the businesses in relation to OI. Findings – The research focused on the relationship of private stakeholders to OI in the context of in situ OI activities. The results obtained are consistent with literature on OI (Chesbrough, 2003). However, there are differences: if the elements mentioned by the respondents are described in literature, their representation of OI and its components allows us to affirm that this practice is not generalised and that it is often open to interpretation. That emphasises the importance of the role LLs can play as intermediaries to accompany private stakeholders in the OI process. Private stakeholders look for a guide to develop their OI know-how and find their way in the OI ecosystem. Originality/value – The value of this paper is to bridge the research on OI done with private organisation and the research on LLs. The research literature did not pay much attention to the representation of the private stakeholders in the OI ecosystem. This paper has provided the start to open up that field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference63 articles.

1. Almirall, E. and Wareham, J. (2008), “Living labs and open innovation: roles and applicability”, The Electronic Journal for for Virtual Organizations and Networks , Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 21-46.

2. Baccarne, B. , Logghe, S. , Veeckman, C. and Schuurman, D. (2013), “Why collaborate in long-term innovation research? An exploration of user motivations in Living Labs”, 4th ENoLL Living Lab Summer School 2013, Abstracts Presented at the 4th ENoLL Living Lab Summer School, European Network of Living Labs, Brussels.

3. Bergvall-Kareborn, B. (2009), “Concept design with a living lab approach”, Hawai International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS ′42), Big Island, HI.

4. Bogers, M. , Afuah, A. and Bastian, B. (2010), “Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions”, Journal of Management , Vol. 36 No. 4.

5. Brunswicker, S. and Ehrenmann, F. (2013), “Managing open innovation in SMEs: a good practice example of a german software firm”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management , Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 33-41.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3