A review of integrated thinking research in developed and developing economies

Author:

Ecim DusanORCID,Maroun WarrenORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis paper assesses the state and development of integrated thinking research in selected developed and developing economies by providing a “stock taking” of the literature included in the Scopus Database based on filtered criteria.Design/methodology/approachA search was performed on the Scopus Database and all sources containing “integrated thinking” in the title, abstract, or keywords were extracted. A total of 98 sources from 2011–2021 are analysed. These are coded with the support of a content analysis and a bibliometric analysis to determine research objectives and methods, affiliations, the locus of enquiry and epistemological perspectives.FindingsThere is a steady increase in attention devoted to integrated thinking research. The earliest studies were concerned primarily with the type of extra-financial information being included in an organisation's reports. This has given way to studies concerned with the operationalisation of integrated thinking. The current research has predominantly focussed on non-positivist epistemologies at the macro- and meso-levels with limited research undertaken at organisational levels.Practical implicationsResearch on integrated thinking is particularly relevant in the context of developing economies where integrated thinking can be used as a means to value-creation, sustainable development and stakeholder inclusivity.Social implicationsThis paper provides a useful reference for practitioners, academics and journal editors interested in the development of integrated thinking research.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the need for more active research on integrated thinking and reporting in developing economies because much of what has been published to date comes from developed nations. This paper provides an overview of the state of integrated thinking research and presents important areas for future research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting

Reference80 articles.

1. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2004

2. Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2017

3. Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap;Journal of Corporate Citizenship,2004

4. Adams, C., Druckman, P. and Picot, R. (2020), “Sustainable development goals disclosure (SDGD) recommendations”, available at: https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ICAS5045_SDGD_Recommendations_A4_22pp_AW3-1.pdf (accessed 10 January 2022).

5. The importance of regulation-induced innovation for sustainable development;Sustainability,2011

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3