Concepts and effects: ordering and practice in foresight

Author:

Bussey Marcus

Abstract

Purpose This article seeks to reflect on the role of key concepts in foresight and futures work. The goal is to explore a set of concepts and link them to the effects they have in the world of foresight practice. It is argued that concepts order foresight practice and that though each foresight context and practitioner is unique, concepts bring a sense of order and coherence to foresight work and futures thinking. This reflection is placed in the context of a set of first principles the author acknowledges as his starting place for futures thinking and foresight practice. Design/methodology/approach The paper takes the form of conceptual analysis. Findings Concepts have effects and these can be assessed based on their ability to increase social and personal resilience in contexts characterised by change, complexity and uncertainty. Research limitations/implications Foresight practitioners clarify their own values and ethics through reflection on the concepts they use and the processes they deploy when working with clients. Practical implications More reflective foresight practice; greater conceptual clarity when reflecting on and communicating/teaching foresight and futures thinking. Originality/value This paper offers a basis for orienting foresight work towards the broader social goal of resilience through a deepened appreciation of how concepts inform process and structure meaning.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference39 articles.

1. Adams, D. (1982), Life, the Universe and Everything, Pan Macmillan, London.

2. Brandom, R.B. (2008), Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

3. Bussey, M. (2008), “A world of exception: exploring the thought of Loren Eiseley”, in Tandy, C. (Ed.), Death and Anti-Death: Thirty Years after Loren Eiseley (1907-1977), Vol. 5, Ria University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 165-196.

4. Bussey, M. (2009a), “Six shamanic concepts: exploring the between in futures work”, Foresight, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 29-42.

5. Bussey, M. (2009b), “Causal layered pedagogy: rethinking curricula practice”, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 19-32.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3