Abstract
PurposeCommercial property development builds floor space in anticipation of potential, but unknown, future demand, making it particularly prone to risk and uncertainty. The research explores the degree to which property developer decision-making is objective and rational and the degree to which it relies on behavioural instincts and intuition. Decision-making theory, including heuristics, is considered and its prevalence in the field of commercial property development is examined.Design/methodology/approachA “dual-processing” decision-making model, comprising intuitive System 1 and objective System 2 processing, is proposed and tested. Inductive research using template analysis of interviews, with “high status” commercial property developers, explored whether the model offers an accurate representation of developers' behaviour and effective lens through which to examine decisions made under conditions of risk and uncertainty.FindingsParticipants believed they adopted objective and rational approaches to complex commercial property development decisions. Analysis of interviews reveals that System 1 heuristics and intuition play significant roles in decision-making behaviour, leading to potential bias and systematic error. The research concludes that the dual-processing model provides a useful lens through which to better understand the decision-making approach adopted by commercial property developers.Originality/valueThe research represents the rare application of behavioural theory to the realm of commercial property development and provides new and original insight as to how important investment decisions are made under conditions of risk and uncertainty, with implications for professional practice.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference68 articles.
1. Exploring the ‘Notional Property Developer’ as a policy construct;Urban Studies,2012
2. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain;Journal of Risk Research,2009
3. A U–Shaped model for the development of intuition by level of expertise;New Ideas in Psychology,2001
4. Betsch, T. (2008), “The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making”, in Plessner, H., Betsch, C. and Betsch, T. (Eds), Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making: 3-22, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献