Scientific information transfer: a conceptual model for scientific communication in IranDoc

Author:

Khosrowjerdi Mahmood,Alidousti Sirous

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to design a conceptual model for the scholarly communication system in the Iranian Research Institute for Scientific Information and Documentation (IranDoc).Design/methodology/approachSome models have been developed to describe the scholarly communication process in different contexts but few considered this process from the organizational point of view. In the model, the organizational structure of scientific communication in IranDoc was considered. This model has four levels:, e.g. person‐to‐persons (P2P) scientific communication, person‐to‐organizations (P2O) scientific communication, organization‐to‐organizations (O2O) scientific communication, and organization‐to‐persons (O2P) scientific communication.FindingsA conceptual model for scholarly communication within IranDoc is designed. Scientific and research institutions can establish their scholarly communication system by customizing the model.Research limitations/implicationsThe model is fairly conceptual and does not refer to technological aspects of the system. The implementation implications of the model are also not considered, so it could not be used directly in action. As it has been developed specifically for IranDoc, it may need some revisions to be used in other contexts.Originality/valueCompared to the earlier models, the main differences and innovations in the model are: its organizational structure; detailed functions of the organizational scholarly‐communication; researcher based approach of the model; and different and new levels of the model analysis. This model can be applied in research institutions and generalized to those institutions in which information plays an important role.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference26 articles.

1. American Library Association (ALA) (2006), Scholarly Communication Toolkit, American Library Association, Chicago, IL, available at: www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlissues/scholarlycomm/scholarlycommunicationtoolkit/toolkit.htm (accessed 17 January).

2. Bjork, B.C. (2005), A Lifecycle Model of the Scientific Communication Process, available at: http://oacs.shh.fi/publications/Model35explanation2.pdf (accessed 9 January 2008).

3. Borgman, C. (2000), “Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 412‐30.

4. Borgman, C. (2007), Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

5. Buck, A.M., Flagan, R.C. and Coles, B. (1999), Scholar's Forum: A New Model for Scholarly Communication, available at: http://library.caltech.edu/publications/scholarsforum/scholarsforum.pdf (accessed 17 January 2006).

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3