Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media

Author:

Gu Feng,Widén‐Wulff Gunilla

Abstract

PurposeThe focus of this paper is to study the influence of social media on scholarly communication. The aim is to provide an overview of researchers' use of Web 2.0 techniques, and discuss a possible change of information behaviors in the context of scholarly communication.Design/methodology/approachA web survey was distributed to a targeted sample of university staff (professors, teachers, researchers, and doctoral students). SPSS was utilized as a main tool to synthesize and analyze data, and present the results.FindingsWeb 2.0 tools are well‐known to researchers. Most researchers are familiar with blogs, wikis, social networks, multimedia sharing, and online document. Social media provide a convenient environment for scholarly communication. Depending on different aims within the scholarly communication process, researchers choose appropriate modes of communication in their research work.Research limitations/implicationsA combination of content analysis with survey and/or interviews may highlight other aspects of Web 2.0, which is not possible using a single method of content analysis.Originality/valueThere are few studies on the changes of scholarly communication in the context of Web 2.0. This study provides new insights for exploring the effects of Web 2.0 tools on scholarly communication and the development of new information behavior to match the scholarly environment of social media. This understanding can aid the researchers to keep abreast of new characteristics of scholarly communication and help the librarians to develop the correlative services in the scholarly environment of social media.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference38 articles.

1. Anderson, P. (2007), “All that glisters is not gold – Web 2.0 and the librarian”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 195‐8.

2. Barjak, F. (2006), “The role of the internet in informal scholarly communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57 No. 10, pp. 1350‐67.

3. Beer, D. (2008), “Social network(ing) sites … revisiting the story so far: a response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison”, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 516‐29.

4. Bertin, P. (2008), “A three‐phase model proposal for the evolution of scientific communication: from first print periodicals to current electronic communication system”, Transinformacao, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 17‐28.

5. Birdsall, W.F. (2007), Web 2.0 as a Social Movement, available at: www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/a40.html (accessed 17 June 2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3