Author:
Gu Feng,Widén‐Wulff Gunilla
Abstract
PurposeThe focus of this paper is to study the influence of social media on scholarly communication. The aim is to provide an overview of researchers' use of Web 2.0 techniques, and discuss a possible change of information behaviors in the context of scholarly communication.Design/methodology/approachA web survey was distributed to a targeted sample of university staff (professors, teachers, researchers, and doctoral students). SPSS was utilized as a main tool to synthesize and analyze data, and present the results.FindingsWeb 2.0 tools are well‐known to researchers. Most researchers are familiar with blogs, wikis, social networks, multimedia sharing, and online document. Social media provide a convenient environment for scholarly communication. Depending on different aims within the scholarly communication process, researchers choose appropriate modes of communication in their research work.Research limitations/implicationsA combination of content analysis with survey and/or interviews may highlight other aspects of Web 2.0, which is not possible using a single method of content analysis.Originality/valueThere are few studies on the changes of scholarly communication in the context of Web 2.0. This study provides new insights for exploring the effects of Web 2.0 tools on scholarly communication and the development of new information behavior to match the scholarly environment of social media. This understanding can aid the researchers to keep abreast of new characteristics of scholarly communication and help the librarians to develop the correlative services in the scholarly environment of social media.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference38 articles.
1. Anderson, P. (2007), “All that glisters is not gold – Web 2.0 and the librarian”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 195‐8.
2. Barjak, F. (2006), “The role of the internet in informal scholarly communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57 No. 10, pp. 1350‐67.
3. Beer, D. (2008), “Social network(ing) sites … revisiting the story so far: a response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison”, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 516‐29.
4. Bertin, P. (2008), “A three‐phase model proposal for the evolution of scientific communication: from first print periodicals to current electronic communication system”, Transinformacao, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 17‐28.
5. Birdsall, W.F. (2007), Web 2.0 as a Social Movement, available at: www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/a40.html (accessed 17 June 2010).
Cited by
96 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献