Mapping corporate disclosure theories

Author:

von Alberti‐Alhtaybat Larissa,Hutaibat Khaled,Al‐Htaybat Khaldoon

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to map corporate disclosure theories as a step towards filling a gap in the theoretical background for corporate disclosure research. The purpose of the map is to encompass a range of particular theories relating to corporate disclosure and to demonstrate the complex relationships between different notions of the financial disclosure phenomenon. This will help new researchers to understand how particular corporate disclosure theories are related, as well as help with teaching accounting theories at undergraduate and postgraduate level.Design/methodology/approachA deductive and inductive approach to theory building was applied. The deductive approach suggests identifying the gap in the literature, the inductive approach then prescribes theory building in three stages: phenomenon observation, categorisation and relationship building. This approach serves to develop a theoretical map integrating the corporate disclosure theories.FindingsThe paper discusses theories that recognise actual features of financial markets – market failure, information asymmetry and adverse selection – to provide an explanation for the existence of corporate reporting regulations and managerial incentives, which control and determine the maximum level of corporate information under these conditions. It then integrates these theories in a map seeking to explain corporate disclosure levels, mandatory and voluntary, financial and narrative. A combination of theoretical supplements – codification theory, Dye's theory of mandatory and voluntary disclosure, and disclosure transformation theory – are proposed in this framework as theories to explain processes of change in mandatory and voluntary corporate disclosure in practice.Originality/valueAnother benefit mapping these theories is to provide useful insights into existing disclosure theories, which may help to explain why some empirical results have been inconsistent with the predictions of these theories. No similar attempts have been published in the accounting literature.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting,Management Information Systems

Reference81 articles.

1. Abayo, A.G., Adams, C.A. and Roberts, C.B. (1993), “Measuring the quality of corporate disclosure in less developing countries: the case of Tanzania”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 145‐58.

2. Abd‐Elsalam, O.H. and Weetman, P. (2003), “Introducing international accounting standards to an emerging capital market: relative familiarity and language effect in Egypt”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 63‐84.

3. Adelegan, O.J. (2003), “Capital market efficiency and the effects of dividend announcement on share prices in Nigeria”, African Development Review, Vol. 15 Nos 2/3, pp. 218‐36.

4. Ahmed, K. and Courtis, J.K. (1999), “Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta‐analysis”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 35‐61.

5. Akerlof, G.A. (1970), “The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 488‐500.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3