Author:
Hu Guangwei,Pan Wenwen,Lu Mingxin,Wang Jie
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to provide details of a study on the widely shared definition of e‐government and to help scholars – especially young scholars – to understand the scope and meaning of the field.Design/methodology/approachFrom 1998‐2007, a ten‐year time‐span, 632 articles from the three world‐leading academic databases, including Wiley InterScience, Elsevier ScienceDirect, and SCI Expanded, were retrieved and 324 were analyzed using CATA software (Concordance 3.20), to identify the vocabulary that was used frequently by e‐government scholars. Then the distinct vocabulary was used to construct the widely shared definition of e‐government.FindingsIn those 324 articles, 57 words generated from the text analysis formed the basis for imputing a widely shared definition of the field of e‐government. The definition was conceptualized by six elements.Research limitations/implicationsTwo limitations of the pool of articles selected may be noted. First, articles were drawn from three leading academic databases in an effort to distinguish e‐government from other fields; but such an approach omitted any consideration of how e‐government definitions varied from different academic fields. Second, because the pool of articles was drawn only from these three, journals excluded by these databases were thus omitted.Originality/valueThe study is unique in that it discusses the definition of e‐government by an exploratory approach. The universal shared definition extracted could serve as either a screen or a magnet for future research. And the methodology could be applied to several academic fields, including administration and management, library and information science, e‐records management, computer science, etc.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference51 articles.
1. Abrahamson, E. and Hambrick, D.C. (1997), “Attentional homogeneity in industries: the effect of discretion”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18, pp. 513‐32.
2. Allen, B.A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G. and Roy, J. (2001), “E‐governance and government online in Canada partnerships, people, and prospects”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 93‐104.
3. Anthopoulos, L.G., Siozos, P. and Tsoukalas, I.A. (2007), “Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re‐designing e‐Government services”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 353‐76.
4. Astley, W.G. (1985), “Administrative science as socially constructed truth”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 497‐513.
5. Becher, T. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, 2nd ed., Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 67‐8.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献