Author:
Murat Celik H.,Yankaya Ugur
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test whether the rail transit investment in Izmir, Turkey has had positive valuation impacts on the surrounding residential properties, and to estimate the value of travel time using relevant parameters.Design/methodology/approachThe necessary data were collected via a survey including all real‐estate agents in the area. To test the research question, the Hedonic Price Model (HPM) is used as the research technique. The obtained parameters are also used to estimate the value of travel time.FindingsThe findings of the models has indicated that the proximity to rail stations was valued at $250‐300 per meters, and the value of travel per hour was $1.47‐1.83 on average.Research limitations/implicationsThese findings should be checked with more consistent database using transaction process, and the mortgage loan rate which was not legislated at the time of study.Practical implicationsUntil a mortgage loan rate is registered in turkey, the estimated parameters can be used in the cost‐benefit analysis of rail transit investments in Turkey.Originality/valueThe theoretical premise that “any improvement in accessibility will be capitalized into the land values” is tested one more time in a developing country case whose urban environment is substantially different from those of the developed world, especially the North American cities. Furthermore, a new methodology using the HPM parameters is also suggested to estimate the value of travel time.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference23 articles.
1. Al‐Mosaind, M.A., Dueker, K.J. and Strathman, J.G. (1993), “Light rail transit stations and property values: a hedonic price approach”, Transportation Research Record, No. 1400, pp. 90‐4.
2. Alonso, W. (1964), Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Bajic, V. (1983), “The effects of a new subway line on housing prices in metropolitan toronto”, Urban Studies, Vol. 20, pp. 147‐58.
4. Bollinger, R.C. and Ihlanfeldt, K.R. (1997), “The impact of rapid rail transit on economic development: the case of Atlanta's MARTA”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 42, pp. 179‐204.
5. Cambridge Systematics Inc. (1998), “TCRP Report 35: Economic Impact Analysis of Transit Investment: Guidebook for Practitioners”, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献