Author:
Mesabbah Mohammed,Arisha Amr
Abstract
Purpose
– Performance Management (PM) processes have become a potent part of strategic and service quality decisions in healthcare organisations. In 2005, the management of public healthcare in Ireland was amalgamated into a single integrated management body, named the Health Service Executive (HSE). Since then, the HSE has come up with a range of strategies for healthcare developments and reforms, and has developed a PM system as part of its strategic planning. The purpose of this paper is to review the application of PM in the Irish Healthcare system, with a particular focus on Irish Hospitals and Emergency Services.
Design/methodology/approach
– An extensive review of relevant HSE’s publications from 2005 to 2013 is conducted. Studies of the relevant literature related to the application of PM and of international best practices in healthcare performance systems are also presented.
Findings
– PM and performance measurement systems used by the HSE include many performance reports designed to monitor performance trends and strategic goals. Issues in the current PM system include inconsistency of measures and performance reporting, unclear strategy alignment, and deficiencies in reporting (e.g. feedback and corrective actions). Furthermore, PM processes have not been linked adequately into Irish public hospitals’ management systems.
Research limitations/implications
– The HSE delivers several services such as mental health, social inclusion, etc. This study focuses on the HSE’s PM framework, with a particular interest in acute hospitals and emergency services.
Originality/value
– This is the first comprehensive review of Irish healthcare PM since the introduction of the HSE. A critical analysis of the HSE reports identifies the shortcomings in its current PM system.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference79 articles.
1. Aidemark, L.G.
(2001), “The meaning of balanced scorecards in the health care organisation”,
Financial Accountability & Management
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 23-40.
2. Arah, O.A.
,
Klazinga, N.
,
Delnoij, D.
,
ten Asbroek, A.
and
Custers, T.
(2003), “Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement”,
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 377-398.
3. Barnabè, F.
(2011), “A ‘system dynamics-based balanced scorecard’ to support strategic decision making: insights from a case study”,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 446-473.
4. Baxter, P.
and
Jack, S.
(2008), “Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers”,
The Qualitative Report
, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 544-559.
5. Berwick, D.
(2008), “A transatlantic review of the NHS at 60”,
BMJ
, Vol. 337, p. a838, available at: www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a838
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献