Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings

Author:

Oliveira Helena CostaORCID,Rodrigues Lúcia Lima,Craig Russell

Abstract

PurposeWe explore the relationship between the balanced scorecard (BSC) and neo-bureaucracy by investigating whether the operationalization of the BSC incorporates “neo-bureaucratic” ideas and whether the BSC implemented in a Portuguese Local Health Unit (LHU) demonstrates a neo-bureaucratic approach.Design/methodology/approachWe conduct semi-structured interviews with LHU staff and analyse documents to assess whether features of bureaucratic organization were evident in the use of a BSC by the LHU.FindingsWe found nine bureaucratic features evident in the LHU's BSC. These were systematization, rationality, authority, jurisdiction, professional qualification, knowledge, discipline, transparency and accountability. The BSC used at the LHU demonstrated a neo-bureaucratic approach.Originality/valueOur study helps to demystify bureaucracy and overcome prevailing prejudices regarding some of its principles. Health care managers should recognize and endorse neo-bureaucratic principles in developing a BSC. They should recognize the BSC as involving a neo-bureaucratic approach. The BSC is a valuable management tool that hospital managers should find useful in fostering flexibility, collaboration, innovation and adaptation – all of which should help lead to improved healthcare outcomes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference47 articles.

1. Two types of bureaucracies: enabling and coercive;Administrative Science Quarterly,1996

2. Measurement and health care management;Financial Accountability and Management,2009

3. The meaning of balanced scorecard in the health care organization;Financial Accountability and Management,2001

4. Contractual health services performance agreements for responsive health systems: from conception to implementation in the case of Qatar;International Journal for Quality in Health Care,2018

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Review of Balanced Scorecard Application in Public Hospital Setting;Contributions to Environmental Sciences & Innovative Business Technology;2024

2. Modeling European health systems: a theoretical exercise;The European Journal of Health Economics;2023-09-04

3. Port Authority of Cartagena: Evidence of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard;Sustainable Development;2023-06-13

4. Evidence of neo-bureaucracy and institutional isomorphism in the implementation and functioning of the balanced scorecard: A case study;Cogent Business & Management;2023-02-26

5. Comparing Hospital Efficiency: An Illustrative Study of Knee and Hip Replacement Surgeries in Spain;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2023-02-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3