Author:
Goldsmith Paul,Moon Jackie,Anderson Paul,Kirkup Steve,Williams Susan,Gray Margaret
Abstract
Purpose
– Error reporting by healthcare staff, patient-derived complaints and patient-derived medico-legal claims are three separate processes present in most healthcare systems. It is generally assumed that all relate to the same cases. Given the high costs associated with these processes and strong desire to maximise quality and standards, the purpose of this paper is to see whether it was indeed the case that most complaints and claims related to medical errors and the relative resource allocation to each group.
Design/methodology/approach
– Electronic databases for clinical error recording, patient complaints and medico-legal claims in a large NHS healthcare provider organisation were reviewed and case overlap analysed.
Findings
– Most complaints and medico-legal claims do not associate with a prior clinical error. Disproportionate resource is required for a small number of complaints and the medico-legal claims process. Most complaints and claims are not upheld.
Research limitations/implications
– The authors have only looked at data from one healthcare provider and for one period. It would be useful to analyse other healthcare organisations over a longer time period. The authors were unable to access data on secondary staffing costs, which would have been informative. As the medico-legal process can go on for many years, the authors do not know the ultimate outcomes for all cases. The authors also do not know how many medico-legal cases were settled out of court pragmatically to minimise costs.
Practical implications
– Staff error reporting systems and patient advisory services seem to be efficient and working well. However, the broader complaints and claims process is costing considerable time and money, yet may not be useful in driving up standards. System changes to maximise helpful complaints and claims, from a quality and standards perspective, and minimise unhelpful ones are recommended.
Originality/value
– This study provides important data on the lack of overlap between errors, complaints and claims cases.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference14 articles.
1. Bendall-Lyon, D.
and
Powers, T.L.
(2001), “The role of complaint management in the service recovery process”,
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 278-286.
2. Benn, J.
,
Koutantji, M.
,
Wallace, L.
,
Spurgeon, P.
,
Rejman, M.
,
Healey, A.
and
Vincent, C.
(2009), “Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety”,
Quality & Safety in Health Care
, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 11-21.
3. Ferguson, C.C.
and
Lamb, G.
(2015), “A scholarly pathway in quality improvement and patient safety”,
Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000772, published ahead of print.
4. Furedi, F.
and
Bristow, J.
(2012), “The social cost of litigation”, available at: www.cps.org.uk/files/reports/original/120905122753-thesocialcostoflitigation.pdf (accessed 12 August 2015).
5. Illingworth, J.
(2014), “Developing and testing a framework to measure and monitor safety in healthcare”,
Clinical Risk
, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 64-68.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献