Author:
Van Den Assem Barend,Dulewicz Victor
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide a greater understanding of the general practitioner (GP)-patient relationship for academics and practitioners. A new model for dyadic professional relationships specifically designed for research into the doctor-patient relationship was developed and tested. Various conceptual models of trust and related constructs in the literature were considered and assessed for their relevance as were various related scales.
Design/methodology/approach
– The model was designed and tested using purposefully designed scales measuring doctors’ trustworthiness, practice orientation performance and patient satisfaction. A quantitative survey used closed-ended questions and 372 patients responded from seven GP practices. The sample closely reflected the profile of the patients who responded to the DoH/NHS GP Patient Survey for England, 2010.
Findings
– Hierarchical regression and partial least squares both accounted for 74 per cent of the variance in “overall patient satisfaction”, the dependent variable. Trust accounted for 39 per cent of the variance explained, with the other independent variables accounting for the other 35 per cent. ANOVA showed good model fit.
Practical implications
– The findings on the factors which affect patient satisfaction and the doctor-patient relationship have direct implications for GPs and other health professionals. They are of particular relevance at a time of health reform and change.
Originality/value
– The paper provides: a new model of the doctor-patient relationship and specifically designed scales to test it; a greater understanding of the effects of doctors’ trustworthiness, practice orientation and performance on patient satisfaction; and a new framework for examining the breadth and meaning of the doctor-patient relationship and the management of care from the patient’s viewpoint.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference51 articles.
1. Anderson, L.A.
and
Dedrick, R.F.
(1990), “Development of the trust in physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships”,
Psychological Reports
, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 1000-1091.
2. Andersson, L.M.
and
Bateman, T.S.
(1997), “Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects”,
Journal of Organizational Behavior
, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 449-469.
3. Ashleigh, M.J.
,
Higgs, M.J.
and
Dulewicz, V.
(2012), “A new propensity to trust scale and its relationship to well-being: implications for HRM policies and practices”,
HRM Journal
, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 360-376.
4. Calnan, M.
and
Rowe, R.
(2006), “Trust relations in the ‘new’ NHS: theoretical and methodological challenges”, Working Paper 14/2006, Economic and Social Research Council, University of Kent, Canterbury.
5. Carrington, K.
(2007), “Toward the development of a new multidimensional trust scale”, PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献