Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how fairness evaluations are constructed in a B2B context.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts a field study of Air Greenland and its internal and external customers based on strong structuration theory (Stones, 2005). The authors employ context and conduct analysis to analyze how fairness evaluations emerge across four levels of structuration.FindingsThe paper finds that fairness evaluations emerge as a result of the interaction between external institutional pressures, agents' internal structures, and situated reflection and outcomes. The construction of fairness evaluations was embedded in contradictory institutional structures, where groups of actors constructed different evaluations of fair profits, procedures and prices. Actors furthermore worked on changing position-practice relations which shifted relations, external structures and affected outcomes and fairness evaluations.Originality/valueThis paper offers a conceptualization of embedded agency as emerging across the four levels of structuration. This contributes to debates in strong structuration theory through conceptualizing and analyzing how actors may be both be constrained and oriented by structures while reflexively adapting structures across the four levels of structuration. The paper extends extant pricing fairness research by illustrating how actors' construction of fairness flexibly develop fairness evaluations while responding to legitimacy and societal demands, including the needs of particular customer groups.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference76 articles.
1. Cost allocation in Britain: towards an institutional analysis;European Accounting Review,2000
2. The evolution of cost-based pricing rules in Britain: an institutionalist perspective;Review of Political Economy,2003
3. Air Greenland annual report (2018), available at: www.airgreenland.dk/media/pxupl0jh/ag_dk_a-rsberetn2018-dk.pdf
4. Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia Actors' institutional work and reflexivity trap;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2018
5. Institutional work and the interplay of stability and change in public budgeting reform: the case of public universities in Iran;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2021