The adoption of technology orientation in healthcare delivery

Author:

Lee Olivia F.,Meuter Matthew L.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the role of technology through the study of electronic health record system in delivering patient‐centered services. The goal is to identify the antecedents and consequences of adopting a technology orientation (TECHOR) approach in a large‐scale hospital and healthcare system.Design/methodology/approachA grounded approach is used whereby extensive literature review and field studies were conducted over a two‐year period. The three major field research activities included observation on hospital premises, semi‐structured interviews, and focus group discussions with hospital employees from a large‐scale hospital and healthcare system.FindingsThe findings reveal that TECHOR is institutionalized as a result of its demonstrated effectiveness in delivering patient‐centered services with improved cost effectiveness, efficiency, safety, and quality control.Research limitations/implicationsEmpirical testing of the presented framework is an important future research direction to validate the current qualitative investigation.Practical implicationsBy understanding the driving forces and consequences of TECHOR, healthcare managers can better understand and manage their technology initiatives. Such effort will help healthcare organizations to create new services in meeting evolving demands and establishing long‐lasting competitive advantage.Originality/valueThis paper fulfills a research gap by presenting a firm‐level construct crucial to successful planning and implementation of technology‐enabled health services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Health Policy

Reference47 articles.

1. American Medical Association (2009), “H.R.1, the ‘American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,’ explanation of health information technology (HIT) provisions”, available at: www.ama‐assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/399/arra‐hit‐provisions.pdf (accessed 24 June 2009).

2. Ashill, N.J., Frederikson, M. and John, D. (2003), “Strategic marketing planning: a grounded investigation”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37 Nos 3/4, pp. 430‐60.

3. Atreja, A.G., Steven, M., Pollock, D.A., Olmsted, R.N. and Brennan, P.J. (2008), “Opportunities and challenges in utilizing electronic health records for infection surveillance, prevention and control”, American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 36, April, pp. S37‐S46.

4. Baron, R.J., Fabens, E.L., Schiffman, M. and Wolf, E. (2005), “Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff?”, Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 143 No. 3, pp. 222‐7.

5. Bates, G.W. (2009), “Inside the stimulus package: cash for using electronic health record”, OBG Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 48‐50.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3