Abstract
PurposeThere is limited research that utilizes the consequential‐conflictual (CC) approaches, which utilized radical orientation of double loop, second order and reorientation of organizational learning strategies. Both the functional‐institutional (FI) and CC approaches are integrated with the sustainability and ecological resources management literature. The aim of this paper is to fill this research gap.Design/methodology/approachThe paper applies FI and CC sociological approaches.FindingsThis paper's contribution to the managerial auditing education literature is based on the proposition that ethics education can improve the moral and ethical reasoning of auditors, when the educational processes incorporate both the FI and CC sociological organizational learning strategies. The paper suggests that ethics education in auditing could benefit from experiential teaching methods utilized in allied applied disciplines of medicine, engineering, and educational psychology.Research limitations/implicationsSociological approaches have been commonly applied in behavioral managerial accounting and control systems research. This paper extends the FI and CC framework to ethics education in managerial auditing research.Practical implicationsThe subject of accounting ethics education is important to auditors. When accounting ethics education utilizes both the FI and CC teaching approaches, the managerial auditing education processes become interactive and cooperative by bringing experiential organizational experiences to the classroom.Originality/valueAccounting ethics education is shaped by ecological and environmental sustainability concerns. Recently, business school interest and growth in sustainability management has contributed to the integration of ethics education in managerial auditing and accounting contexts, overcoming the shortcomings accounting programs experienced from stand‐alone ethics courses.
Subject
Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference100 articles.
1. Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972), On Purposeful Systems, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
2. Adams, C.A. and Larrinaga‐Gonzales, C. (2007), “Engaging with organizations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 333‐55.
3. Albrecht, P., Burandt, S. and Schaltegger, S. (2007), “Do sustainability projects stimulate organizational learning in universities?”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 403‐15.
4. Aldrich, H.E. (1979), Organizations and Environments, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
5. Anderson‐Wilk, M. (2008), “Science and stewardship in a monolithic conservation movement: facilitating positive change”, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 63 No. 5, pp. 142‐6.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献