Abstract
PurposeThe purpose is to investigate a position for engaged scholarship bridging the gulf between theorizing and practice in a social system perspective using Design Thinking for assisting the emergence of a semantic reservoir in a polycentric network “in spe”.Design/methodology/approachThe paper combines social systems theory with the concept of engaged scholarship based on Design Thinking, and illustrates how such a research position might be applied to problems of polycentric networks as a theoretical/methodological case.FindingsThe paper concludes on a possible role for an engaged scholarship as a midwife assisting the emergence of a shared semantic reservoir that is needed to make commitments and couplings possible to become a polycentric network. Design Thinking is explained as a structured way to irritate (disturb) other systems, and the role of a shared semantic reservoir for a polycentric network “in spe” is accounted for.Originality/valueBridging the gulf between theorizing and practice in management theory is under-explored, and social systems theory underlines the immanent rigor-relevance gap, which this paper suggests a way not to overcome, but to bridge. The discussion of the rigor-relevance gap is revisited. Also, the critical process for a shared semantic reservoir to emerge in the formation of poly-centric networks is underexplored and so are its role for coupling of networks. The conceptual understanding thereof is also contributed to.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference30 articles.
1. Complexity and change: two ‘semantic tricks’ in the triumphant oscillating organization;Systemic Practice and Action Research,2000
2. Conceptual history and the diagnostics of the present;Management and Organizational History,2011
3. Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge;Journal of Applied Communication Research,2008
4. dschool (2009), “Design thinking bootleg”, Hasso Plattner Institue of Design at Stanford, available at: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg (accessed 22 June 2019).
5. Bridging the rigour–relevance gap in management research: it's already happening!;Journal of Management Studies,2009
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献