Author:
Brown Ross,Mawson Suzanne
Abstract
PurposeAs a means of contributing to the literature surrounding the evolution and growth of firms, this paper seeks to outline the explanatory concept of growth trigger points. It aims to examine the forces that propel firms towards different stages of growth and argues that high‐growth firms (HGFs) often encounter important “trigger points” that can affect their growth capabilities. The paper's main aim is to define, conceptualise and illustrate the role of trigger points in promoting rapid growth within businesses.Design/methodology/approachThe primary methodological approach used was intensive case study research of HGFs in Scotland. The case studies, 40 firms in total, were compiled using a mixed method research approach that included, inter alia, background desk research, firm interviews and interviews with business advisers.FindingsThe research discovered that growth trigger points are extremely diverse and play a major role in shaping the growth trajectory of firms, and highlights three main types of trigger points. While trigger points can fundamentally reconfigure organisations, providing a catalyst for a business to undertake a period of rapid, transformative growth, these events can conversely cause severe organisational turbulence or even decline. Often the critical period determining the ultimate success of the growth opportunity presented is the post‐trigger transition period identified by the authors.Practical implicationsThe paper aims to inform public policy on how to support high‐growth entrepreneurship. From a policy perspective, understanding these trigger points is essential for helping policymakers to prioritise and optimise their interventions to help promote rapid firm growth.Originality/valueThe paper's unique contribution to the literature is to help conceptualise how firms move along a growth trajectory, by introducing the novel concept of growth “trigger points”. The paper also seeks to inform public policy, so that interventions can be better attuned to the requirements of dynamic growth businesses.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference50 articles.
1. Abrahamson, E. and Fairchild, G. (1999), “Management fashion: lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 708‐740.
2. Acs, Z.J., Parsons, W. and Tracy, S. (2008), High‐Impact Firms: Gazelles Revisited, Office of Advocacy of the US Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.
3. Andersson, S. and Tell, J. (2009), “The relationship between the manager and growth in small firms”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 586‐598.
4. Barney, J.B. (2001), “Is the resource‐based theory a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 41‐56.
5. Baum, J.R., Locke, E.A. and Smith, K.G. (2001), “A multidimensional model of venture growth”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 292‐303.
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献