Author:
Murshed Shahriar Tanvir Hasan,Uddin Shahadat,Hossain Liaquat
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to explore changes in communication networks during organizational crisis. In the literature, various terms such as organizational mortality, organizational death, bankruptcy, decline, retrenchment and failure have been used to characterize different forms and facets of organizational crisis. Communication network studies have typically focussed on nodes (e.g. individuals or organizations), relationships between those nodes and subsequent affects of these relationships upon the network as a whole. Email networks in contemporary organizations are fairly representative of the underlying communication networks.
Design/methodology/approach
– The changing communication network structure at Enron Corporation during the crisis period (2000-2001) has been analyzed. The goal is to understand how communication patterns and structures are affected by organizational crisis. Drawing on communication network crisis and group behaviour theory, three propositions are tested: communication network becomes increasingly transitive as organizations experience crisis; communication network becomes less hierarchical as organizations are going through crisis; and communication network becomes more reciprocal as organizations are going through crisis.
Findings
– In this research analysis, the support of these three propositions was noticed. The results of tests and their implications are discussed in this paper.
Originality/value
– This study builds on an emerging stream of research area that applies social network analysis to organizational interaction data to study various questions related to organizational change and disintegration. These findings could help managers in designing an effective approach to monitor regular functionalities of their organizations.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference62 articles.
1. Becker, H.S.
and
Strauss, A.L.
(1956), “Careers, personality, and adult socialization”,
American Journal of Sociology
, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 253-263.
2. Borgatti, S.
,
Everett, M.
and
Freeman, L.
(2002), “UCINET for Windows: software for social network analysis”,
Harvard Analytic Technologies
, Vol. 6.
3. Brass, D.J.
,
Butterfield, K.D.
and
Skaggs, B.C.
(1998), “Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective”,
The Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 14-31.
4. Cameron, K.S.
,
Kim, M.U.
and
Whetten, D.A.
(1987), “Organizational effects of decline and turbulence”,
Administrative Science Quarterly
, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 222-240.
5. Cartwright, D.
and
Harary, F.
(1956), “Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory”,
Psychological Review
, Vol. 63 No. 5, pp. 277-293.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献