Author:
Agndal Henrik,Nilsson Ulf
Abstract
PurposeThe literature on activity‐based costing (ABC) that deals with the allocation of indirect purchasing costs primarily draws on a transactional approach to purchasing. This presents a problem, since a large share of purchasing takes place within relationships. The purpose of this paper is to point out complexities in applying ABC to indirect purchasing costs, when purchasing takes place within long‐term relationships. The interaction model is used as a framework.Design/methodology/approachA case study is conducted on a first‐tier supplier in the Swedish automotive industry to illustrate real‐life purchasing practices and to point out subsequent difficulties in applying ABC principles. This firm is selected because efforts have simultaneously been undertaken to employ supplier relationship management (SRM) and to implement costing techniques. About 23 interviews were conducted and approximately 31 hours of interview data were collected.FindingsThe case shows that many functions tend to be involved in exchange within long‐term relationships. This generates additional purchasing‐related costs not previously recognized in the costing literature. It also leads to difficulties in allocating these costs.Originality/valueComplexities when implementing ABC are presented, concerning: allocation of costs relating to SRM; allocation of costs pertaining both to transactions and to relationships; less apparent cost drivers due to involvement of many functions in exchanges; and cost allocation over time.
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference92 articles.
1. Ahmed, M.N. and Scapens, R.S. (1991), “Cost allocation theory and practice: the continuing debate”, in Ashton, D., Hopper, T. and Scapens, R.S. (Eds), Issues in Management Accounting, Prentice‐Hall, Hemel Hampstead, pp. 39‐60.
2. Anderson, S.W., Glenn, D. and Sedatole, K.L. (2000), “Sourcing parts of complex products: evidence on transaction costs, high‐powered incentives and ex‐post opportunism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25, pp. 723‐49.
3. Armstrong, P. (2002), “The costs of activity‐based management”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27, pp. 99‐120.
4. Asiedu, Y. and Gu, P. (1998), “Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 883‐908.
5. Ask, U. and Ax, C. (1997), “Produktkalkylering i litteratur och praktik” (“Product costing in theory and practice)”, published doctoral thesis, Gothenburg School of Economics and Commercial Law, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献