Measuring the performance of knowledge resources using a value perspective: integrating BSC and ANP

Author:

Hu Yaoguang,Wen Jingqian,Yan Yan

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to provide insight into how knowledge resources in R & D organizations can be effectively and separately measured for knowledge sharing and transfer. Knowledge is recognized as a durable strategic resource to obtain sustainable competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach – The paper proposes a theoretical framework integrating an analytic network process (ANP) with a balanced scorecard (BSC) to measure the performance of knowledge resources under value perspective. Four indicators and three knowledge value (KV) components including labor value, technology value and utilization value are discussed. The model construction, problem structuring and calculation procedure for measuring the performance of knowledge resources based on ANP and BSC are demonstrated. Findings – Despite a number of models to assess the performance of knowledge resources being proposed, they highlighted a need for separately measuring under value perspective. With the aim of filling this gap, the main finding of the paper is to clarify relevant issues, providing a better framework for assessment of the performance of knowledge resources. Research limitations/implications – To handle the dynamic nature of knowledge, the research should take into account more advanced methods to measure the performance of knowledge resources. Both qualitative and quantitative methods should be utilized in future research. Practical implications – The consequences of measuring the performance of knowledge resources under value perspective may help managers to organize and arrange the separate knowledge resources, improving the knowledge resources exchange between different institutions in R & D organizations. Originality/value – The main contribution of this paper lies in the development of a comprehensive model, which incorporates diversified issues for conducting the performance of knowledge resources under value perspective.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference86 articles.

1. Abran, A. and Buglione, L. (2003), “A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards”, Advances in Engineering Software , Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 339-349.

2. Ahn, J.H. and Chang, S.G. (2004), “Assessing the contribution of knowledge to business performance: the KP3 methodology”, Decision Support Systems , Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 403-416.

3. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-136.

4. Anand, G. , Ward, P.T. and Tatikonda, M.V. (2010), “Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: an empirical examination of differential project success”, Journal of Operations Management , Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 303-315.

5. Arora, R. (2002), “Implementing KM – a balanced scorecard approach”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 240-249.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3