Bringing integration home

Author:

Kaehne Axel,Birrell Derek,Miller Robin,Petch Alison

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to outline relevant policies on the integration of health and social care (HSC) in the four home nations: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and England and offer a comparison of emphasis and approaches and draw out general insights on the implementation of integrated care policy. Design/methodology/approach The paper is written as a piece of critical reflection by drawing on the authors’ knowledge and expertise and wider evidence where available. Findings Since 2010, HSC integration has started to diverge significantly in the four constituent countries of the UK. Although England and Wales have undergone considerable re-organisation of the NHS, Scotland and Northern Ireland have largely been marked by organisational continuity. However, beyond organisational differences, policy approaches, policy emphases and implementation strategies have also started to show considerable dissimilarity across the UK. An important contributory factor may be different ideological perspectives on the role of competition and pilots, partnership, patient choice and organisational incentives to bring about change in the field. Research limitations/implications The paper identifies a serious lack of comparative research in integration policy, despite the considerable opportunities for quasi-experimental studies. This lack of empirical research impedes shared learning across the home nations. Originality/value The paper presents a descriptive comparison of current integration policy between HSC providers in the four home nations. It reveals considerable opportunities for further research and comparative modelling of integration approaches.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference75 articles.

1. Understanding NHS policy making in England: the formulation of the NHS Plan, 2000;The British Journal of Politics & International Relations,2014

2. Information in practice effect of diverging policy across the NHS;British Medical Journal,2005

3. Audit Scotland (2011), Review of Community Health Partnerships, Audit Scotland, Edinburgh, available at: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/docs/health/2011/nr_110602_chp.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016).

4. Audit Scotland (2015), Health and social care integration, Audit Scotland, Edinburgh, available at: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/uploads/docs/report/2015/nr_151203_health_socialcare.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016).

5. Audit Scotland (2016), Changing models of health and social care, Audit Scotland, Edinburgh, available at: www.parliament.scot/Inquiries/AGS_Report_-_Changing_Models_of_HSC.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016).

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3