A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research

Author:

McDonald Heath,Adam Stewart

Abstract

The widespread acceptance of the use of online techniques in market research necessitates appreciation of the relative advantages and disadvantages of these techniques over more traditional research methods. This paper reports on a study which directly compares online and postal data collection methods using the same survey instrument on two samples drawn from the same population of football club subscribers. The results confirm that the online and postal respondents are demographically different. Online data collection is shown to be less expensive per respondent and that data collection is faster, however, an overall lower response level is achieved relative to the postal data collection method. Of greater importance, though, are the findings that respondents seem to answer questions differently online than they do via postal methods. The conclusion here is that online data collection should not be treated as a direct substitute for postal data collection in every instance.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference41 articles.

1. Adam, S. and Deans, K.R. (2000), “Online business in Australia and New Zealand: crossing a chasm”, in Treloar, A. and Ellis, A. (Eds), Proceedings of AUSWEB2K, The Sixth Australian World Wide Web Conference, Southern Cross University, Lismore, 12‐17 June, Cairns, pp. 19‐34, available at: http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw2k/papers/adam/index.html (accessed 17 December 2001).

2. Australian Privacy Commissioner’s Web site (2001), available at: Privacy.gov.au (accessed 20 December 2001).

3. Bachmann, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (1996), “Tracking the progress of e‐mail versus snail‐mail”, Marketing Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 31‐5.

4. Bachmann, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (2000), “E‐mail and snail mail face off in rematch”, Marketing Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 10‐15.

5. Basi, R.K. (1999), “WWW response rates to socio‐demographic items”, Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 397‐400.

Cited by 77 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3