Author:
F. Devlin James,Kumar Roy Sanjit,Sekhon Harjit
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to derive, test and validate a comprehensive, inclusive measure of perceptions of fairness in consumers of financial services, as current attempts to measure fairness in a broad-based multi-dimensional manner are underdeveloped.
Design/methodology/approach
– A quantitative approach where a large-scale sample of the perceptions of financial services consumers is taken in three periods. Subsequently, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are used to analyse the data.
Findings
– Fairness comprises three distinct but related elements, namely, procedural, interactional and distributive fairness, and further sub-dimensions are also apparent. The measurement scale exhibits a high degree of validity and reliability and represents a robust measure of fairness perceptions.
Research limitations/implications
– Previous conceptual suppositions as to the multi-dimensional nature of fairness are strongly supported. A comprehensive scale is provided for fellow researchers to utilise in other settings. The main limitation is that the measures were tested in a single context, although this is offset by the large scale of the pilot exercise and multiple waves of data collection.
Practical implications
– Perceptions of fairness can be measured accurately and tracked, measures for sub-dimensions of fairness can be compared and differences among sectors and demographic segments can be explored. Perceptions of fairness can be related to factors such as trust and purchase intentions in addition to other attitudinal measures.
Originality/value
– The fairness measure developed, tested and validated here is the most comprehensive, multi-dimensional measure of fairness available that the authors know of. As such, it represents a valuable conceptual contribution to the assessment of perceptions of fairness.
Reference66 articles.
1. Adams, J.S.
(1963), “Toward an understanding of inequity”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 5, pp. 422-436.
2. Adams, J.S.
(1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in
Berkowitz, L.
(Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-299.
3. Australian Government Financial Literacy Foundation
(2007), Financial Literacy: Australians’ Understanding Money, Commonwealth of Australia, Barton, ACT.
4. Bagozzi, R.
and
Yi, Y.
(1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74-94.
5. Bechwati, N.N.
,
Sisodia, R.S.
and
Sheth, J.N.
(2009), “Developing a model of antecedents to consumers’ perceptions and evaluations of price unfairness”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62 No. 8, pp. 761-767.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献