Author:
Sharma Piyush,Sivakumaran Bharadhwaj,Marshall Roger
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to conceptualize consumer impulsiveness (CI) as a global trait to explore its influence on a wider range of consumer behaviours and also presents a revised CI scale. Prior research on CI focuses on the impulse buying context and does not establish the cross-cultural invariance of the CI scale.
Design/methodology/approach
– Two studies with undergraduate and MBA students in Singapore, UK and USA were used to develop the revised CI scale and to test its cross-cultural measurement invariance and predictive validity.
Findings
– CI is a three-dimensional construct with cognitive (imprudence), affective (self-indulgence) and behavioural (lack of self-control) dimensions. However, self-indulgence and lack of self-control positively (do not) correlate for consumers with independent (interdependent) self-concepts. These three dimensions also vary in their influence on different types of self-regulatory failures.
Research limitations/implications
– The student participants used in all the studies may be relatively younger and better educated compared to average consumers. Hence, there is a need to test the revised CI scale with diverse consumer populations.
Practical implications
– The revised CI scale would help future researchers study the influence of CI across diverse cultures and self-regulatory failures in a reliable and rigorous manner.
Social implications
– Our findings may help control the onset and spread of self-regulatory failures among young consumers by early identification of their psychological origins.
Originality/value
– This paper extends the scope of CI beyond impulse buying to study its impact on self-regulatory failure across five diverse behavioural domains (driving, eating, entertainment, shopping and substance abuse).
Reference59 articles.
1. Allahverdipour, H.
,
MacIntyre, R.
,
Hidarnia, A.
,
Shafii, F.
,
Kzamnegad, A.
,
Ghaleiha, A.
and
Emami, A.
(2007), “Assessing protective factors against drug abuse among high school students: self-control and the extended parallel process model”, Journal of Addictions Nursing, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 65-73.
2. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
3. Arneklev, B.J.
,
Elis, L.
and
Medlicott, S.
(2006), “Testing the general theory of crime: comparing the effects of ‘imprudent behavior’ and an attitudinal indicator of ‘low self-control’”, Western Criminology Review, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 41-55.
4. Baumeister, R.F.
(2002), “Yielding to temptation: self-control failure, impulsive purchasing and consumer behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 670-676.
5. Bearden, W.O.
,
Netemeyer, R.G.
and
Teel, J.E.
(1989), “Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influences”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 473-481.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献