Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of social capital to the literature on academic libraries as it pertains to leadership and management as well as to demonstrate the limitations that the current discursive use of the phrase “buy in” represents.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper brings critical insights from outside fields of intellectual inquiry, including business, knowledge management, computer and information systems, and sociology. The paper is organized around a series of questions posed at the end of the introduction and serves to introduce its audience to the key findings made in these fields as well as to apply relevant observations about social capital to the unique context of leadership and management in academic libraries.
Findings
– The paper elucidates a number of limitations to the current practice of using the phrase “buy in” as a way of exploring the concept of social capital. The most significant risk that the phrase’s use incurs is a lack of context and clarity around critical concepts of leadership, including trust, trustworthiness, and shared vision and meaning.
Originality/value
– This paper argues that a broader contextualization of “buy in” in the scholarship on social capital can lead to a richer dialog that allows academic library administrators to understand the concurrent and competing factors that accompany an exchange where “buy in” is given or withheld.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference70 articles.
1. Adler, P.S.
and
Kwon, S.
(2002), “Social capital: prospects for a new concept”,
The Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 17-40.
2. Agho, A.O.
,
Mueller, C.W.
and
Price, J.L.
(1993), “Determinants of employee job satisfaction”,
Human Relations
, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 1007-1027.
3. Andersson, L.M.
and
Pearson, C.M.
(1999), “Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 452-471.
4. Arthur, M.
and
Tierney, B.
(2013), “Subject librarian initiative at the University of Central Florida Libraries: collaboration amongst Research and Information Services, Acquisitions, and Collection Services, and the Office of Scholarly Communication”, Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference, Charleston, SC, pp. 486-491.
5. Ashforth, B.E.
(1994), “Petty tyranny in organizations: a preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences”,
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 126-140.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献