Increasing the effectiveness of reward management: an evidence‐based approach

Author:

Armstrong Michael,Brown Duncan,Reilly Peter

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to explore the reasons why many organisations do not evaluate the effectiveness of their reward policies and practices, examines the approaches used by those organizations which do evaluate, and develops a model of evidence‐based reward management which describes how evaluation can take place.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on a study of why organisations do or do not evaluate reward and an examination of what organizations taking evaluation seriously were doing about it. The study was based on a survey of 173 reward and HR practitioners and 13 case studies.FindingsThe survey found that only 46 per cent of respondents carried out a full evaluation. Other surveys have established that an even lower proportion evaluated. Those organisations which evaluate reward do so because they recognise that it is necessary to obtain value for money from their considerable expenditure on pay. Those who do not evaluate offer a number of reasons, but the most important was lack of resources or time. It was established that while an evidence‐based approach was desirable there was no set pattern of conducting an evaluation.Practical implicationsInformation about the evaluation practices of the case study organisations and the concept of evidence‐based reward management as an approach to evaluation provide guidance to practitioners on how they can measure the effectiveness of their reward policies and practices.Originality/valueThe paper extends the pioneering research of Corby et al. to develop new insights into the process of reward evaluation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference39 articles.

1. Accounting for People Task Force (2003), Accounting for People Report, DTI, London.

2. Aragon‐Sanchez, A., Barba‐Aragon, I. and Sanz‐Valle, R. (2003), “Effects of training on business results”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 956‐80.

3. Baron, A. and Armstrong, M. (2007), Human Capital Management: Achieving Added Value Through People, Kogan Page, London.

4. Bevan, S. (2006), New Realism in Reward Strategy, e‐reward, Stockport.

5. Bloom, M.C. and Milkovich, G.T. (1995), Issues in Managerial Compensation Research, Centre for Advanced Human Resources Studies, Working Paper, Series 95‐24.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rewards Effectiveness;Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management;2023

2. HOTEL FRONT LINE EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTIONS ON LEADERSHIP AND WORKPLACE MOTIVATION IN TIMES OF CRISIS;Tourism and hospitality management;2022

3. Modelling research productivity of university researchers using research incentives to crowd-in motivation;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2021-12-17

4. Antecedents and consequences of perceived job security of professional accountants;Asian Review of Accounting;2021-10-08

5. Employee and Organisational Performance: Employees Perception of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards System.;Applied Journal of Economics, Management and Social Sciences;2021-08-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3