The effectiveness of the organising model in higher education

Author:

Byford Iona

Abstract

PurposeThis empirical paper aims to explore the effectiveness of the organising model from a worker perspective in unionised workplaces within higher education support services.Design/methodology/approachA case study approach is used in two university Unison branches. Three themes were used to measure the efficacy of the organising model: participation, identification with the union, and union effectiveness.FindingsThe findings were mixed in terms of the success of the organising model in this setting. In terms of the three themes of analysis, there was strong instrumental participation in union matters at the workplace but a lack of deeper penetration of the wider organising agenda in terms of identifying with the union, represented by half the respondents only feeling the salience of their union membership at the workplace. Most respondents felt their union was effective at the workplace in terms of improving pay and conditions but the effectiveness of broader union building aims as proposed by the organising model was not endorsed.Research limitations/implicationsThe implications for the organising model from this research are that there need to be more resources and effort delivered at the workplace level through reps and members to make it truly effective and sustainable.Originality/valueThis research adds to a body of knowledge concerned with workers themselves and how they experience trade unionism at their place of work with the focus of their experience examined through the lens of the organising model.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference43 articles.

1. Bach, S. and Kolins Givan, R. (2004), “Public service unionism in a restructured public sector: challenges and prospects”, in Kelly, J. and Willman, P. (Eds), Union Organisation and Activity, Routledge, London.

2. Blanden, J. and Machin, S. (2003), “Cross‐generation correlations of union status for young people in Britain”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 391‐415.

3. Blyton, P. and Turnbull, P. (1998), The Dynamics of Employee Relations, Macmillan, London.

4. Bronfenbrenner, K., Friedman, S., Hurd, R.W., Oswald, R.A. and Seeber, R.L. (1998), Organising to Win: New Research on Union Strategies, ILR Press/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

5. Carter, R. (2000), “Adoption of the organising model in British trade unions: some evidence from manufacturing, science and finance (MSF)”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 117‐36.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3