The relationship between motherhood and professional advancement

Author:

Brown Lorra M.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the perceptions and realities regarding professional advancement following motherhood. Results show great conflict between work and home life regardless of employer support or family‐friendly policies. The paper also seeks to assess conflicting societal attitudes relating to work/family responsibilities and roles, with a focus on the stereotyping and discrimination towards women endemic in the workplace following motherhood.Design/methodology/approachThe paper utilized a survey with Likert‐type options and open‐ended questions to measure both perceived and real impact of motherhood on a woman's professional advancement. The sample was purposive featuring working mothers in professional fields at the managerial level and above, all of whom have children who require some level of childcare.FindingsMore than 90 working mothers responded to the survey. The results show a contrast between qualitative and quantitative data and indicate a contradiction between a working mother's expected response and her reality.Research limitations/implicationsFindings indicate that flexible work arrangements do not support working mothers seeking advancement. Limitations may include the size and selection of population.Practical implicationsWorking mothers who strive to continue an upward career track following motherhood acknowledge that motherhood has an extreme impact on professional advancement. Many mothers chose to slow down their career path, even when employer policies are family‐friendly.Originality/valueOne of the most compelling findings in this paper is the disparity between women's perception of their situations and the reality of their actual experiences and behaviors, as indicated in the contrasts between the qualitative and the quantitative findings.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference37 articles.

1. Belkin, L. (2003), “The opt‐out revolution”, The New York Times Magazine, October 26, p. 42.

2. Benko, C. and Weisberg, A. (2007), Mass Career Customization: Aligning the Workplace with Non‐traditional Workforce, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

3. Bowman, K. (2003), Poll Pourri, paper presented at The Independent Women's Forum, available at: www.idf.org (accessed March 28, 2003).

4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006), “Compensation summary”, Bureau of Labor Statistics, available at: www.bls.gov (accessed March 31, 2006).

5. Cabrera, E. (2009), “Fixing the leaky pipeline: five ways to retain female talent”, People and Strategy, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 40‐6.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3