Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education

Author:

Tam Maureen

Abstract

Purpose – This paper was written for practitioners in higher education, including academics and instructional designers who are engaged in curriculum revision. It aims to examine the notion of outcomes-based education, survey the literature and provide a critical review of the outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. The outcomes-based approach is completely student-centred, which focuses on what students know and can actually do. Sharpening the focus onto student learning outcomes goes beyond mere tinkering with traditional structures and methods; it really constitutes a paradigm shift in educational philosophy and practice. Design/methodology/approach – This paper begins with a summary of developments in institutional quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education in recent decades. Then, it identifies the underlying concepts and principles that characterize the outcomes-based approach for the design and improvement of curriculum and instruction in higher education. Finally, the outcomes-based approach is critically reviewed for its value from the perspectives of both practical and philosophical considerations. Findings – In so doing, it is directed to the heightening of sensitivity as to the manner and situations in which the outcomes-based approach may be employed. Originality/value – A final note is that while learning outcomes approaches are useful, care is needed to take into account the different views and perceptions of those involved in defining learning outcomes and to keep the ultimate goal of improving student learning clearly in mind. Care must also be taken to avoid rigidity and conceptual reification during implementation in curriculum and instructional design.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference18 articles.

1. Adam, S. (2004), “Using learning outcomes: a consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels”, July, Report on United Kingdom presented at the Bologna Seminar, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.

2. Adam, S. (2006), “An introduction to learning outcomes”, in Froment, E. , Kohler, J. , Purser, L. and Wilson, L. (Eds), EUA Bologna Handbook, Raabe, Berlin, p. B2.3-1.

3. Apling, R.N. (1989), Vocational Education Performance Standards, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, Washington DC.

4. Ashworth, P.D. and Saxton, J. (1990), “On ‘competence’”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 3-25.

5. Bagnall, R. (1994), “Performance indicators and outcomes as measures of educational quality: a cautionary critique”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 19-32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3