Author:
Dal Forno Ana Julia,Forcellini Fernando Antonio,Kipper Liane Mählmann,Pereira Fernando Augusto
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to describe benchmarking to evaluate the product development process (PDP) from a lean perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
– The work was conducted by means of case studies at large companies in Brazil that develop products, based on a gap in the literature involving a lack of indicators to diagnose how lean are PDPs considering the principles and practices of the lean approach.
Findings
– The results indicate in a quantitative manner that the 12 companies of the multiple case study are implementing the lean approach in their PDPs in an isolated or systematic manner through the categories – process, management, structure, people, product, client, supplier and waste.
Research limitations/implications
– The large companies in the case studies are located in different positions of the supply chain and the year that the company began introducing lean manufacturing was not considered, or the maturity of each firm.
Practical implications
– Based on the diagnosis, it was possible to propose a set of actions so that the PDP at each company can be structured in a lean manner, improving competitiveness.
Originality/value
– The main contribution of the study is a simple, useful and reproducible method that has a set of measurable indicators and graphic representation identifying the lean product development practices, as well as a structured guide to the implementation of improvements that allow companies from different sectors to be compared at a national level and also in the international market.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference48 articles.
1. Afonso, P.
,
Nunes, M.
,
Paisana, A.
and
Braga, A.
(2008), “The influence of time-to-market and target costing in the new product development success”,
International Journal Production Economics
, Vol. 115 No. 2, pp. 559-568.
2. Allee, V.
(2009), “Value – creating networks-organizational issues and challenges”,
The Learning Organization
, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 427-442.
3. Anand, G.
and
Kodali, R.
(2008), “Benchmarking the benchmarking models”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal
, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 257-291.
4. Anderson, K.
and
Mcadam, R.
(2004), “A critique of benchmarking and performance measure: lead or lag?”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal
, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 465-483.
5. Associação Brasileira de Treinamento e Desenvolvimento
(2006), “Pesquisa o Retrato do treinamento no Brasil”, available at: www.ppge.ufrgs.br/giacomo/arquivos/espe609/abtd-2007.pdf (accessed July 29, 2013).
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献