Reflections on teaching and tweaking a discovery layer

Author:

Fyn Amy F.,Lux Vera

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the hypotheses that led to the selection and implementation of a number of customizable features in Serials Solutions' “Summon” discovery layer tool.Design/methodology/approachUndergraduate students were surveyed to determine their preferences regarding certain customizable features in the Summon discovery layer tool.FindingsThe authors were most interested in asking students their preferences regarding the ability to add newspapers and outside resources into their search results, as well as their interest in the database recommendation feature. The default Summon settings were selected based on hypotheses grounded in the knowledge of information seeking behavior of undergraduate students. However, it was discovered that the student preferences uncovered through the use of the survey often ran counter to initial assumptions. The results of the case study indicate that this population of students is overwhelmingly interested in having Summon recommend databases in which students might continue their research. However, the results were not as clear regarding the inclusion of newspaper sources and sources from outside the institution in the search results.Originality/valueThe paper's findings demonstrate the importance of supplementing research‐driven hypotheses with specific data‐driven feedback from users when determining the customization and layout of library research tools and technology.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. Boock, M., Chadwell, F. and Reese, T. (2009), “WorldCat Local task force report to LAMP”, available at: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/11167/Worldcat%20local%20task%20force%20report_cost%20redacted.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 13 July 2012).

2. Brubaker, N., Leach‐Murray, S. and Parker, S. (2012), “Implementing a discovery layer: a rookie's season”, Computers In Libraries, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 12‐19.

3. Cardwell, C., Lux, V. and Snyder, R. (2012), “Beyond simple, easy, and fast: reflections on teaching Summon”, College & Research Libraries News, Vol. 73 No. 6, pp. 344‐7.

4. Fagan, J.C., Mandernach, M., Nelson, C., Paulo, J. and Saunders, G. (2012), “Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library”, Information Technology & Libraries, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 83‐112.

5. Fahey, S., Gordon, S. and Rose, C. (2011), “Seeing double at Memorial University: two WorldCat Local usability studies”, Partnership: The Canadian Journal Of Library & Information Practice & Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 1‐14.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3