Author:
Dalmarco Gustavo,Zawislak Paulo Antônio,Hulsink Willem,Brambilla Flávio
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to characterize the knowledge flow between companies and universities based on national and sectoral systems of innovation perspective. It is argued here that high-tech sectors can describe a knowledge flow mainly based on scientific research, while sectors with lower technological impact may establish relations based on technical needs.
Design/methodology/approach
– A case study research was conducted in the horticulture and aerospace sectors in Brazil. Thirteen interviews were performed with chief executive officer’s and academic researchers from both fields.
Findings
– Results demonstrated differences in technology development and knowledge infrastructure when comparing both sectors, reflecting the impacts of national and sectoral systems of innovation. The horticulture sector presented technological limitations due to restricted eating habits, logistics, knowledge development at universities and difficulties on the establishment of partnerships between local companies and Embrapa, the main public research centre. Such restrictions limit academic activities while companies look for research partnerships abroad. Space industry also has limited technological development due to international embargoes and lack of research alignment between companies and universities. Companies end up developing research activities internally, usually funded by governmental tenders.
Research limitations/implications
– The horticulture sector has limitations, as it is not the main agriculture area in science and technology applications. Future studies may analyse areas like soy beans, sugar cane and coffee, which may present differences specially regarding sectoral systems of innovation.
Originality/value
– The finding of this paper may influence the review of sectoral innovation policies, improving the development of local research activities which may be a source of valuable knowledge to companies. It also demonstrates the importance of the knowledge flow to improve sector’s technology level.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference29 articles.
1. Bekkers, R.
and
Freitas, I.M.B.
(2008), “Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter?”,
Research Policy
, Vol. 37 No. 10, pp. 1837-1853.
2. Chesbrough, H.W.
(2006), “Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation”, in
Chesbrough, H.
,
Vanhaverbeke, W.
and
West, J.
(Eds),
Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm
, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-12.
3. Cohen, W.M.
,
Nelson, R.R.
and
Walsh, J.P.
(2002), “Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”,
Management Science
, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 1-23.
4. Cooke, P.
(2001), “Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy”,
Industrial and Corporate Change
, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 945-974.
5. De Fuentes, C.
and
Dutrénit, G.
(2012), “Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit”,
Research Policy
, Vol. 41 No. 9, pp. 1666-1682.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献