Author:
Mui‐Siang Tan Patricia,Yeow Lim Chee
Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to address the value relevance of summary accounting measures and fundamental income statement variables in the market valuation of biotech firms.Design/methodology/approachA biotech firm's stock price was related to its underlying financial accounting variables. Using the Ohlson model, the linear function of book value and earnings was employed, and the basic model was augmented with additional accounting variables. These accounting variables may provide information relevant for forming an approximation on the present value of expected future abnormal earnings.FindingsResults show non‐linearities in the pricing of accounting variables Both book value and earnings are value relevant, but positive earnings are positively priced while negative earnings are negatively priced. R&D spending and selling, general and administrative expenses are also priced as assets for loss‐reporting firms, and as expenses for profit‐reporting observations. Including analysts’ forecasts of future earnings and long‐term growth rate in the model results in an insignificant increase in the explanatory power of the regressions.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research could attempt to examine the role of non‐financial variables which can proxy for the soft variables and intangibles like strategic alliances and product pipeline. Decomposing revenue into product sales, interest income and collaborative research revenue may further enhance our understanding on the determinants of the market value of biotech stocks.Originality/valueThis paper provides insights into the valuation of biotechnology stocks. Results show non‐linearities in the pricing of summary accounting measures and fundamental income statement variables.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,Accounting
Reference32 articles.
1. Ashton, Z. (2000), “A foolish checklist for biotech investing”, available at: TheMotleyFool.com
2. Barron, O., Byard, D., Kile, C. and Riedl, E. (2002), “High‐technology intangibles and analysts’ forecasts”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40, pp. 289‐312.
3. Barron, O., Kim, O., Lim, S. and Stevens, D. (1998), “Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 73, pp. 421‐33.
4. Barth, M., Beaver, W. and Landsman, W. (1998), “Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 1‐34.
5. Barth, M., Kasznik, R. and McNichols, M. (2001), “Analyst coverage and intangible assets”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39, pp. 1‐34.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献