Author:
Gooding Chase,Stephenson E. Frank
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of CVS’s decision to stop tobacco sales on the company’s share price.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper uses event study methodology to examine the same day effect of CVS’s announcement and the one-year later effect of CVS’s announcement. Competing pharmacy retail chains’ stock performance is included for comparison purposes.
Findings
CVS’s shares fell by about one percentage point on the day of the company’s announcement while competitors’ share prices increased. A year later, however, CVS’s share price had increased by about twice as much as competitors’ share prices.
Originality/value
The finding that a company can make a decision that harms its short-run share price in exchange for a long-run share appreciation suggests that short-termism may not be as significant a concern as some critics of corporate management suggest.
Reference14 articles.
1. The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials;Public Choice,2014
2. Short-term expectations in listed firms: the effects of different owner types;Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting,2015
3. The impact of managers’ short-term perceptions on technology management and R&D in UK companies;Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,1996
4. Do foreign owners favour short-term profit? Evidence from Germany;Cambridge Journal of Economics,2016
5. Political short termism: a possible explanation;Public Choice,2010