Abstract
Aims to examine the issue of industrial strategy (IS), paying particular
attention to the case of Britain. Sets out to assess the possibility and
nature of an industrial strategy for Britain, in Europe, and within the
global scene, taking into account the world we live in as we see it.
Accordingly, the perspective is driven and shaped by a quest for a
realistic, feasible and sustainable industrial strategy. In order to
achieve these objectives, first examines the theoretical arguments
behind much of British, and more generally, Western industrial policies.
Following this, outlines and assesses British industrial policy
post‐Second World War then compares and contrasts British industrial
policy with that of Europe, the USA, Japan and the newly industrialized
countries. Then examines recent developments in economics and
management which may explain the “Far Eastern” miracle, and points to the
possibility of a successful, narrowly self‐interested, IS for Europe and
Britain, based on the lessons from (new) theory and international
experience. To assess what is possible, develops a theoretical framework
linking firms in their roles as consumers and/or electors. This hints
at the possibilities and limits of feasible policies. All these ignore
desirability which, in the author′s view, should be seen in terms of
distributional considerations, themselves contributors to
sustainability. Accordingly, discusses a desirable industrial strategy
for Britain in Europe which accounts for distributional considerations,
and goes on to examine its implications for the issue of North‐South
convergence. Concludes by pointing to the limitations of the analysis
and to directions for developments.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference190 articles.
1. Adams, S. (1985), La‐Roche vs Adams, Fontana, London.
2. Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, Information Costs and
Economic Organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62 No.
5, pp. 777‐95.
3. Anchordoguy, M. (1988), “Mastering the Market: Japanese Government
Targeting in the Computer Industry”, Harvard Business School,
Cambridge, MA.
4. Arrow, K. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for
Invention”, in Nelson, R.A. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Economic
Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Arrow, K. (1970), “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues
Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non‐market Allocation”, in
Haveman, R.H. and Margolis, J. (Eds), Public Expenditure and Policy
Analysis, Markham, Chicago, IL.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献