Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to contribute to the scarce body of academic research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in BRIC countries and Russia in particular, by performing a comparative analysis of CSR, reporting of ten major players in the energy sector in the USA and Russia.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study applies a content analysis research design in order to obtain an in-depth understanding of the key themes communicated in the reports. Drawing on an institutional approach to CSR, this study attempts to explain revealed differences in CSR reporting in Russian and American companies.
Findings
– The results suggest that Russian companies compared to American ones report more extensively on the areas of social performance and CSR issues related to employees and consumers. Nevertheless, American reports contain topics of global concern in the scope of environmental performance that are omitted by Russian companies.
Practical implications
– The paper deepens the understanding of CSR reporting specificity related to an institutional context and suggests that CSR fills different needs in different types of societies.
Originality/value
– The study contributes to the academic research on CSR in BRIC countries and provides some insights into how the revealed differences between Russian and American reports in the energy industry can be explained using an institutional approach.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference63 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V.
and
Jackson, G.
(2010), “Comparative and international corporate governance”, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 485-556.
2. Alon, I.
,
Lattemann, C.
,
Fetscherin, M.
,
Li, S.
and
Schneider, A.M.
(2010), “Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 6-22.
3. Amberla, T.
,
Wang, L.
,
Juslin, H.
,
Panwar, R.
,
Hansen, E.
and
Anderson, R.
(2011), “Corporate responsibility performance in the forest industries: a comparative analysis of student perceptions in Finland and the USA”, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 472-489.
4. Blagov, Y.E.
(2008), Report on Social Investments in Russia 2008: Integrating CSR Principles into Corporate Strategy, The Russian Managers Association, Moscow.
5. Campbell, J.L.
(2006), “Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility”, The American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 925-938.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献