Abstract
Three difficulties confront researchers in the resilience arena. At the conceptual level, there is the need to identify resilient actions, including those that may seem to violate established norms, such as rational behavior. At the operational level, it may be difficult to model individual, group, and community behavior in a single framework. At the empirical level, it is especially difficult to gather data on resilience to specify models. The purpose of this paper is to summarize progress on all three planes. First, defines several important dimensions of economic resilience to disasters. Second, shows how computable general equilibrium modeling represents a useful framework for analyzing the behavior of individuals, businesses, and markets. Third, summarizes recent progress in the conceptual and empirical modeling of resilience, including the incorporation of disequilibria and the recalibration of key behavioral parameters on the basis of empirical data. Fourth, uses the results of a case study to illustrate some important issues relating to the subject.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Alesch, D. and Petak, W. (2001), Overcoming Obstacles to Implementing Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Policies: Stage 1 Report, Technical Report MCEER‐01/0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
2. Brookshire, D. and McKee, M. (1992), “Other indirect costs and losses from earthquakes: issues and estimation”, Indirect Economic Consequences of a Catastrophic Earthquake, FEMA, Washington, DC.
3. Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O'Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. and von Winterfelt, D. (2003), “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance seismic resilience of communities”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 19, pp. 733‐52.
4. Chang, S. and Shinozuka, M. (2004), “Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities”, Earthquake Spectra, forthcoming.
5. Chang, S., Svekla, W. and Shinozuka, M. (2002), “Linking urban infrastructure and urban economy: simulation of water disruption impacts in earthquakes”, Environment and Planning B, Vol. 29, pp. 281‐301.
Cited by
546 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献