Management of aggression care plans in a forensic intellectual disability service: a ten-year progress update
Author:
Kitchen David,Thomas Cathy,Chester Verity
Abstract
Purpose
– Standardised approaches to the management of aggression and violence are critical for all stakeholders of intellectual disability services. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Management of Aggression Care Plan (MoACP). The care plan aims to reduce levels of restrictive interventions, to ensure any interventions relative to aggression and violence are the least restrictive possible, and to promote adaptive behaviours and support life enriching opportunities, in a manner which is personalised to the unique profiles of every patient.
Design/methodology/approach
– The MoACP was first described by Thomas et al. (2005). This paper describes the rationale, theoretical basis, structure and benefits of the care plan, and provides details of revisions made to the plan in response to evidence-based practice recommendations.
Findings
– The value of implementing a structured approach to the care planning of management of aggression and violence, in reducing the frequency and impact of restrictive practices, and promoting life enriching opportunities is described.
Practical implications
– The paper describes a number of practical features of the care plan which most support its continued effectiveness, including patient involvement, individual patient focused training, and audit.
Originality/value
– Although many services undertake localised approaches to the care planning of management of violence and aggression in forensic intellectual disability services, few have been described in the published literature.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Phychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. Alexander, R.T.
,
Green, F.N.
,
O'Mahony, B.
,
Gunaratna, I.J.
,
Gangadharan, S.K.
and
Hoare, S.
(2010), “Personality disorders in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison of clinical, forensic and outcome variables and implications for service provision”, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 650-58. 2. Alexander, R.T.
,
Hiremath, A.
,
Chester, V.
,
Green, F.N.
,
Gunaratna, I.J.
and
Hoare, S.
(2011), “Evaluation of treatment outcomes from a medium secure unit for people with intellectual disability”, Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 22-32. 3. Barnett, R.
,
Stirling, C.
and
Pandyan, A.D.
(2012), “A review of the scientific literature related to the adverse impact of physical restraint: gaining a clearer understanding of the physiological factors in cases of restraint related death”, Medicine, Science and the Law, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 137-42. 4. BBC One
(2011), “Undercover care: the abuse exposed”, Panorama, available at: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b011pwt6 (accessed 31 May 2011 ). 5. British Institute of Learning Disabilities
(2010), BILD Code of Practice for Trainers in the Use of Physical Interventions: A Guide for Trainers and Commissioners of Training, British Institute of Learning Disabilities, Birmingham.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|