Abstract
PurposeResource cognition – identifying valuable resources and capabilities and assessing their potential for redeployment – is a pivotal management capability for strategic renewal. This study explores how managerial cognition in this activity may be biased, leading to erroneous results.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs an action research approach: A full resource cognition project was conducted together with the top management of a case firm, including the CEO and members of the supervisory board.FindingsResource cognition may be distorted by four cognitive biases: The insulation bias – tending to keep one's perspective insularly to the current business; the novelty bias – tending to exclusively focus on innovation and recent achievements; the status quo bias – tending to view opportunities from the current situation and structural set-up; and the scaffolding bias – tending to adopt concepts and examples indiscriminately to the firm.Originality/valueActive participation in a resource cognition project provided first-hand and insightful practice-based evidence on resource cognition. Aware practitioners can take preventive steps to avoid cognitive biases. This study sheds light on the under researched issue of resource cognition.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference27 articles.
1. Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review;Management Decision,2021
2. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage;Journal of Management,1991
3. What is good action research?;Action Research,2010
4. Editorial;Management Decision,2021
5. Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities?;Strategic Management Journal,1994
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献