Abstract
Purpose
– Several factors are known to influence donations to university athletic departments including previous donations and university affiliation. This research aims to build on prior work by examining whether a university's environmental management initiatives can also influence donor behavior.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper employs a quantitative study on environmental responsibility (ER) and “green management” using donor and non-donor data in the context of a university athletic department to investigate additional (i.e. personal and dispositional) factors that drive donation intentions.
Findings
– Employing tenets of the theory of reasoned action (TRA), the hierarchical regression models confirm prior donor motives and indicate that personal disposition towards the environment and attitude toward environmental initiatives predict donor intentions. These results are set against a backdrop of managerial strategy that seemingly enabled the effects.
Research limitations/implications
– The study should be replicated to advance the decision-making literature. This study focused solely on the attitudinal component of the TRA and only anecdotally accounted for the social norms that might influence the results. Retesting the model where ER is not as well-known or has just been implemented would add credibility to the results. Finally, using a behavioral intention factor limits the explanatory power.
Practical implications
– In a modern giving climate where supply (i.e. donations) is not currently paralleling demand, university athletic departments are continually looking for innovative ways to bolster donor support. The results suggest that ER can be positive for the local community and society at large but also in reciprocal fashion for the organization.
Originality/value
– While results confirming the traditional predictors of donor intentions are not particularly novel, the contribution of this research lies in showing that environmental disposition and importance contribute to the giving dynamic.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V.
,
Rupp, D.E.
,
Williams, C.A.
and
Ganapathi, J.
(2007), “Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, pp. 836-863.
2. Ahmed, N.U.
,
Montagno, R.V.
and
Firenze, R.J.
(1998), “Organizational performance and environmental consciousness: an empirical study”, Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 57-62.
3. Ajzen, I.
and
Fishbein, M.
(1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4. Ambec, S.
and
Lanoie, P.
(2008), “Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 22, pp. 45-56.
5. Argenti, P.A.
(2004), “Collaborating with activists: how Starbucks works with NGOs”, California Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 91-115.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献