Author:
Arne Borgersen Trond,Greibrokk Jørund
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the short run incentives for increasing LTV ratios that develop among mortgagees and mortgagors in the presence of excess return to housing. The paper provides a conventional framework for analyzing the capital structure of housing investments where higher LTV‐ratios comes about as stronger appreciation is met by increased mortgage rates and both mortgagees and mortgagors are short sighted.Design/methodology/approachThe comment applies a capital structure approach to housing investments, highlighting the return to home equity. The paper distinguishes between price and leverage gains and presents a framework where the excess return to housing provides incentives for increasing LTV ratios. To illustrate, the Norwegian housing market is applied. The paper discusses short run market developments and the potential need for macro prudential regulations while introducing credit risk policy, nominal return targets and risk pricing.FindingsThe implementation of a simplistic capital structure approach to housing investments brings about a framework that allows us to present the incentives for, as well as the risk associated with, higher LTV ratios for both mortgagees and mortgagors. Short sightedness among mortgagees, driven by nominal return targets, allows mortgagors higher LTV‐ratios and increased risk taking.Originality/valueWhile standard when analyzing commercial real estate, the capital structure approach – and the formal distinction between price and leverage gains for homeowners – is to the best of the authors' knowledge novel when analyzing housing finance. To understand the mechanisms impacting this playing field is important for both market analysts and regulators.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference18 articles.
1. Anundsen, A.K. and Jansen, E.S. (2011), “Self‐reinforcing effects between housing prices and credit: evidence from Norway”, Discussion Paper No. 651, Statistics Norway, Oslo.
2. Berck, J. and De Marco, P. (2007), Corporate Finance, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.
3. Borgersen, T.A. and Robertsen, K. (2012), “A comment on mortgage procyclicality”, Global Business and Economic Review (in press)..
4. Chambers, M.S., Garriga, C. and Schlagenhauf, D. (2009), “The loan structure and housing tenure decisions in an equilibrium model of mortgage choice”, Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 12, pp. 444‐68.
5. Duca, J.V., Muellbauer, J. and Murphy, A. (2010), “Housing markets and the financial crisis of 2007‐2009: lessons for the future”, Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 6, pp. 203‐17.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献