Developing a matrix and using self-reported scoring to measure librarian engagement on campus

Author:

Broughton Kelly

Abstract

Purpose – The library’s strategic plan calls for the author to “Transform the role of the subject liaison librarian to better engage the campus community.” This statement specifically focusses on the aspect of the liaison role that builds relationships with the campus partners, “to better engage the campus community.” And like the peers, liaison librarians at this mid-size research institution have been struggling not only with implementing but also determining how to measure this new role. The purpose of this paper is to develop one measure of librarian engagement with the campus community. Design/methodology/approach – The author developed a “campus relationship matrix” that articulates dozens of products that could potentially be the result of liaison work, such as co-authoring a grant proposal, developing a class, co-presenting a workshop on article impact metrics, etc. These relationship products were generated by examining the own work and by scanning liaison responsibility statements from other institutions. These products fall into three relationship status levels: emergent, generative, and productive. Each subject librarian was asked to rate his and her relationship with each department he or she serves. Additionally, in order to achieve consistency across the organization in understanding of three relationship levels, the author engaged in an exercise to calibrate the categorization of these work products. During this exercise and through the discussions, greater nuances were revealed about what the author is hoping to achieve with the strategic goal. A review and summary of the ratings is presented. Findings – Baseline counts of relationship types were completed. The author is working to establish goals for next year’s comparisons. In actuality, the specific goals matters much less than the conversations surrounding these results about what work the author should be doing and why and how is valued. Originality/value – This study presents a tool useful for the exploration and measure of librarian relationships with campus.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference12 articles.

1. Bidney, M. (2014), “The library as platform: assessing outreach and engagement in the library of the future”, in Mack, D.C. and White, G.W. (Eds), Assessing Liaison Librarians: Documenting Impact for Positive Change , ACRL, Chicago, IL.

2. Childress, D. and Hickey, D. (2014), “Liaison librarians and scholarly communication: a framework and strategies for assessment”, in Mack, D.C. and White, G.W. (Eds), Assessing Liaison Librarians: Documenting Impact for Positive Change , ACRL, Chicago, IL.

3. Crawford, A. (2012), New Directions for Academic Liaison Librarians , Chandos Publishing, Oxford.

4. Dale, P. , Holland, M. and Matthews, M. (Eds) (2006), Subject Librarians: Engaging with the Learning and Teaching Environment , Ashgate, Burlington, VT.

5. Hahn, K. (2009), “Introduction: positioning liaison librarians for the 21st century”, Bimonthly Report No. 265, ARL, CNI, and SPARC, Research Library Issues, available at: http://old.arl.org/bm∼doc/rli-265-hahn.pdf (accessed July 19, 2016).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Employing criteria scoring matrix in appraising the economic return of transcending to a circular built environment;Smart and Sustainable Built Environment;2023-07-12

2. Demonstrating library impact: Liaison assessment;The Journal of Academic Librarianship;2020-07

3. Mittendrin oder nur dabei?;Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis;2018-11-28

4. What is your contribution to the funder’s strategy?;Library Management;2018-06-11

5. Project management for digital projects with collaborators beyond the library;College & Undergraduate Libraries;2017-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3