Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the scientific standing of the concept of free will and its role and functioning in social and psychological contracts. It updates Rousseau (2012).
Design/methodology/approach
This is a conceptual paper.
Findings
Social structures that support the exercise of free will are central to the functioning of both social and psychological contracts.
Research limitations/implications
The paper contributes to the debate in the natural and social sciences regarding the existence and functioning of free will in everyday life.
Practical implications
Highlights the importance of the configuration of choices or options people have to promote expression of free will.
Social implications
Social contracts that support or provide attractive options are key to the expression of free will.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to the debate in the natural and social sciences regarding the existence and functioning of free will in everyday life.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference28 articles.
1. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness,1986
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献