Supporting integrated care in practice

Author:

Billings Jenny,Mikelyte Rasa,Coleman AnnaORCID,MacInnes JulieORCID,Allen Pauline,Croke Sarah,Checkland Kath

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the perceptions of key informants on a national support programme for the development of new care models (NCM) in England (2015/2016–2017/2018). It focuses on the perceived facilitators and barriers affecting the development and implementation of the NCM programme and offers some insight into the role of national level support in enabling local integration initiatives. Design/methodology/approach A set of 29 interviews were carried out with a variety of respondents at the national level (including current and past programme leads, strategic account managers, advisors to the programme and external regulators) between October 2017 and March 2018, and analysed thematically. Findings A set of facilitative elements of the programme were identified: the development of relationships and alliances, strong local and national leadership, the availability of expert knowledge and skills, and additional funding. Challenges to success included perceived expectations from the national Vanguard programme, oversight and performance monitoring, engagement with regulators, data availability and quality, as well as timetables and timescales. Crucially, the facilitators and challenges were found to interact in dynamic and complex ways, which resulted in significant tensions and ambiguities within the support programme. Research limitations/implications While the sample was drawn from a range of different senior players and the authors ensured a diverse sample associated with the NCM support programme, it inevitably cannot be complete and there may have been valuable perspectives absent. Originality/value The paper demonstrates that the analysis of facilitators and challenges with respect to the national support of implementation of integrated care initiatives should move beyond the focus on separate influencing factors and address the tensions that the complex interplay among these factors create.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference27 articles.

1. Birkinshaw, J., Toulan, O. and Arnold, D. (2000), “Global account management: linking external demands and internal abilities”, in Birkinshaw, J. and Hagström, P. (Eds), The Flexible Firm: Capability Management in Network Organisations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 43-60.

2. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

3. Checkland, K., Coleman, A., Billings, J., MacInnes, J., Mikelyte, R., Laverty, L. and Allen, P. (2019), “National evaluation of the Vanguard new care models programme interim report: understanding the national support programme”, The University of Manchester, Manchester, March (in press).

4. CQC (2016), “Building bridges, breaking barriers: how care is integrated across health and social care and the impact on older people who use services, and their families and carers”, Care Quality Commission, London, available at: www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20160712b_buildingbridges_report.pdf (accessed 26 April 2019).

5. CQC (2018), “Beyond barriers: how older people move between health and social care in England”, Care Quality Commission, London, available at: www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20180702_beyond_barriers.pdf (accessed 26 April 2019).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3